LSAT Logical Reasoning Strategies for Principle Questions

Performing well on the Logical Reasoning (or “Argument”) section of the Law School Admission Test (LSAT) is crucial for getting a competitive score. This guide will focus on a particular type of question in this section: Principle questions, where you’re asked to read a person’s argument and identify principles or rules underlying the author’s reasoning. This type of question is particularly challenging for a lot of people because it tests your ability to think critically, isolate certain information, and draw parallels between situations.

I am an LSAT tutor with 5+ years of experience helping applicants achieve top scores. I personally scored a 175 on the exam and love bringing personalization and dedication to my tutoring practice, helping students overcome plateaus and reach the scores they need to get admitted to their dream law programs.

This comprehensive guide provides actionable strategies, practical tips, and detailed explanations to help you tackle these LSAT principle questions with confidence.

What Are Principle Questions in the LSAT Logical Reasoning Section?

As mentioned, principle questions require you to identify the principle that underlies or justifies the argument presented in the stimulus. These questions are common, appearing an average of 1-2 times per section. With up to potentially 3 sections of LR on your LSAT, these questions can add up to significantly influence your score.

They often test your ability to distinguish between an argument’s premises and its conclusion while understanding the argument’s reasoning.

Key Characteristics of LSAT Principle Questions

• They frequently use keywords such as "principle," "rule," or "justify."
• They ask you to either identify the principle that supports the argument's conclusion or apply a principle to a specific case.
• Success requires careful analysis of the argument’s structure and the relationship between its elements.

LSAT Principle Questions Example

Here is a sample LSAT principle question from LSAC:

Journalist: To reconcile the need for profits sufficient to support new drug research with the moral imperative to provide medicines to those who most need them but cannot afford them, some pharmaceutical companies feel justified in selling a drug in rich nations at one price and in poor nations at a much lower price. But this practice is unjustified. A nation with a low average income may still have a substantial middle class better able to pay for new drugs than many of the poorer citizens of an overall wealthier nation.

Which one of the following principles, if valid, most helps to justify the journalist’s reasoning?

A. People who are ill deserve more consideration than do healthy people, regardless of their relative socioeconomic positions.

B. Wealthy institutions have an obligation to expend at least some of their resources to assist those incapable of assisting themselves.

C. Whether one deserves special consideration depends on one’s needs rather than on characteristics of the society to which one belongs.

D. The people in wealthy nations should not have better access to health care than do the people in poorer nations.

E. Unequal access to health care is more unfair than an unequal distribution of wealth.

(Note: ‘C’ is the correct answer; this is considered an easier question as most people answered it correctly when it appeared on the exam.)

Why Are LSAT Principle Questions Important?

Principles represent the foundation of logical reasoning and play a pivotal role in understanding how arguments are constructed. In the context of the LSAT, principles help clarify how evidence supports a conclusion drawn or exposes a gap in reasoning. This understanding is particularly valuable in these questions, as well as related types like the strengthen/weaken arguments, which require identifying principles that reinforce a thesis’ validity.

Proficiency with principles extends beyond LSAT principle questions and enhances performance across various logical reasoning question types. It also strengthens your ability to evaluate arguments in the Analytical Reasoning section, where principles often underlie conditional relationships and logical structures.

Beyond the LSAT, the ability to identify and apply principles is an invaluable skill in law school and legal practice. Principles form the backbone of sound arguments, effective communication, and persuasive reasoning. Mastering them equips you to construct well-reasoned arguments, challenge flawed logic, and navigate complex legal scenarios with confidence.

How to Ace LSAT Principle Questions: Tips for Choosing the Correct Answer

Step 1: Identify

Any standardized test, including the LSAT, measures your ability to recognize patterns and act accordingly. Because of this, it’s important that your very first step when facing a new question is identifying what you’re being asked to do.

Remember that LSAT principle questions are designed to test your ability to recognize, apply, and evaluate general principles or rules. These questions require you to connect abstract principles to specific scenarios or arguments. Let’s break this down with clear examples and actionable strategies.

So what exactly is a principle? A principle is a general rule or guideline that governs various specific situations. For example: "A society functions better when all members follow established rules." Generally, principles utilize normative language – “should, ought, good/bad” – to convince the reader of a certain plan of action.

This principle can apply to countless scenarios, such as:

• Example 1: A city implements traffic laws to ensure safety on the roads, requiring drivers to stop at red lights.
• Example 2: A company enforces policies on workplace behavior to create a harmonious environment for its employees.

Principles are broad enough to apply to different contexts but specific enough to guide reasoning in particular cases.

Common Patterns – Thankfully, it’s pretty easy to spot principle questions as they are typically introduced with specific phrases. For example:

• "Which one of the following principles, if valid, most strongly supports the argument?"
• "Which one of the following best illustrates the principle underlying the argument above?"
• "The reasoning above conforms most closely to which one of the following principles?"

Step 2: Approach

In this type of question, you are almost always tasked with identifying the underlying principle that supports the argument. Success requires analyzing the argument’s structure, determining its conclusion, and identifying the reasoning that connects the premises to the conclusion. Principles serve as the foundation of the argument, providing a general rule or guideline that justifies its reasoning, so the first thing you need to do is identify the principle.

For instance, consider the argument:"If a company pollutes the environment, it should be held accountable for the cleanup costs."

To identify the principle behind this argument, look at the relationship between the company's actions (polluting the environment) and its obligation (covering the cleanup costs). The principle governing their relationship would be expressed as: "Companies are responsible for alleviating any negative impact that is caused by their operations.”

From this understanding, the next step is to evaluate the potential principles provided in the answer choices. For example:

Which one of the following principles, if true, would support the argument?

• (A) Companies should be responsible for mitigating the negative effects of their actions.
• (B) Governments should fund environmental cleanups.

The correct answer, (A), directly aligns with the argument’s reasoning, as it reflects the company’s obligation to address the consequences of its actions. (B), on the other hand, introduces a different concept that does not align with the original argument, making it an incorrect choice.

When tackling questions like these, focus on how the principle connects the premises and the conclusion, ensuring the answer choice is both specific enough to address the argument and broad enough to apply to similar scenarios. This approach will help you consistently identify the correct principle.

Step 3: Apply the principle

In this type of question, you are presented with a principle and must evaluate how it applies to a specific case. The goal is to determine which scenario most closely aligns with the general rule or guideline expressed in the principle. To answer these questions effectively, it is essential to understand the principle's scope and the conditions under which it operates.

For example, consider the principle: "If it is raining, then one should carry an umbrella." This statement sets up a clear relationship between a condition (it is raining) and an action (carrying an umbrella). When evaluating scenarios, your task is to identify the situation that best reflects this relationship and adheres to the principle. Scenarios that deviate from the principle, either by ignoring the condition or failing to take the prescribed action, can be eliminated as incorrect.

Let’s walk through another example.

Here is the principle: "A person should return a borrowed item in the same condition in which it was received, unless returning it in a different condition was agreed upon in advance."

The question asks: “Which of the following cases best applies this principle?” What’s the condition and action here? Well, the condition is borrowing and the required action is the responsibility of returning the item in its original condition. The only exception is if both parties agree beforehand to a different condition upon return.

Your answer choices may look something like:

• A. Maria borrows her neighbor's lawnmower and returns it after cleaning the blades and refilling the gas tank.
• B. Jason borrows his friend’s book and returns it with several highlighted passages and handwritten notes, without asking for permission.
• C. Priya rents a car from a rental company, scratches the door, and returns it without informing the company.
• D. David borrows his coworker’s laptop and, with prior approval, upgrades the operating system before returning it.

The right answer is D. because it adheres to the principle: David altered the laptop (changing the operating system), but he had prior approval to do so, which aligns with the exception stated in the principle.

• A is incorrect because while Maria returns the lawnmower in good condition, cleaning and refueling were not explicitly stated in the principle.
• B is incorrect because Jason returns the book in a changed condition (marked up), but there is no indication that this was agreed upon in advance.
• C is incorrect because Priya fails to return the item in its original condition and does not have prior approval to return it in a different state.

Step 4: Check yourself

It’s easy on these questions to get bogged down with the details. Always remember to focus on the key information: what is the principle, and what case closely adheres to or exemplifies this rule?

Make sure to carefully analyze the principle’s wording and scope. Often, principles involve conditional logic like “if X happens, then Y should follow.” Make sure you understand the relationship between any conditions and outcomes. The correct scenario will conform to every part of the principle without introducing elements that contradict or exceed its scope. Cases that deviate from the principle, whether by omitting essential elements or adding unrelated factors, can be ruled out as incorrect.

LSAT Principle Questions Common Mistakes

1. Misinterpreting the argument – Make sure you understand the principle at hand. What is the condition, what is the action, what is the scope?
2. Going too broad or too narrow – Usually, incorrect answer options are almost correct; they just stretch things a bit too far. Be careful to not make assumptions that haven’t been explicitly stated.
3. Overlooking the conditional logic – Watch out for “if… then”, “necessary versus sufficient”, and other key terms that indicate there is something that must happen before something else can take place.
4. Rushing and not using the process of elimination – Go through the answer choices one by one. Often, it’s easier to see the answers that are wrong, before needing to pick the one that’s right.

Additional Examples of LSAT Principle Questions

Note – These are not actual LSAC questions, but they follow the same structure and reasoning.

Example 1

Question: Many local governments require restaurants to post health inspection grades where customers can easily see them. This policy is based on the idea that consumers have a right to make informed choices about where they eat. It also assumes that publicizing these grades will encourage restaurants to maintain higher cleanliness standards, as a poor rating could lead to a loss of customers.

Which of the following principles best justifies the government’s policy?

• A. Consumers should have access to information that significantly affects their well-being.
• B. Businesses should be allowed to regulate their own operations without government interference.
• C. The government should regulate businesses only when public health is at immediate risk.
• D. Customers tend to prioritize health concerns over other factors when choosing where to eat.

Answer: A

• A – Correct, this principle justifies the policy because the law is designed to ensure that consumers have access to relevant health information when making decisions.
• B – Incorrect because the passage supports government regulation, not business self-regulation.
• C – Incorrect because the passage does not state that health must be at immediate risk for regulation to be justified.
• D – Incorrect, for while the statement might be true, the passage is about government policy justification, not consumer behavior.

Example 2

Question: Marta believes that schools should require all students to participate in community service. She argues that volunteering helps young people develop responsibility and empathy. Additionally, many students may not engage in community service on their own, so a mandatory program would ensure that all students receive these benefits.

Which of the following principles, if valid, most strongly supports Marta’s argument?

• A. The primary purpose of school is to provide academic knowledge, not personal development.
• B. Schools should prepare students not just academically but also as responsible members of society.
• C. Students should be free to choose how they spend their extracurricular time.
• D. Mandatory service programs are only effective if students voluntarily choose to participate.

Answer: B

• A – Incorrect, this weakens Marta’s argument by implying that personal development is not the role of schools.
• B – Correct, this strengthens Marta’s argument because it supports the idea that schools should promote social responsibility, not just academics.
• C – Incorrect because this contradicts Marta’s stance; she supports mandatory service.
• D – Incorrect, this suggests that a mandatory program would not work, undermining Marta’s position.

Example 3

Question: A university policy states that any student caught plagiarizing on an assignment will receive a failing grade for the course, regardless of whether the plagiarism was intentional or accidental. The university defends this policy by arguing that students are responsible for understanding citation rules and that a strict policy discourages academic dishonesty.

Which of the following situations most clearly violates the principle underlying the university’s policy?

• A. A professor gives a student a failing grade for an essay after discovering that parts of it were copied from an online source without citation.
• B. A student is accused of plagiarism but argues that they were unaware their actions counted as plagiarism.
• C. A professor requires a student to attend an academic integrity seminar after discovering minor citation mistakes in the student’s paper.
• D. A professor allows a student who unintentionally misquoted a source to revise the assignment instead of failing the course.

Answer: D

• A – Incorrect as this follows the university’s rule: plagiarism results in a failing grade.
• B – Incorrect because while the student claims ignorance, the policy applies regardless of intent, so this does not violate the principle.
• C – Incorrect, the professor’s action does not necessarily replace the failing grade, so it does not directly contradict the policy.
• D – Correct, the principle states that all plagiarism cases, intentional or accidental, result in failure. Allowing revision instead violates the rule.

Final Tips for Mastering LSAT Principle Questions

Mastering Principle Questions on the LSAT requires consistent practice, critical analysis, and a strong grasp of logical reasoning concepts. Here are five key strategies to help you excel:

Practice with real LSAT questions.

The best way to improve is by working through official LSAT practice tests, which provide an authentic experience of principal questions. Focus on identifying patterns in these questions, analyzing the reasoning in both correct and incorrect answers, and understanding how principles are applied. By reviewing explanations thoroughly, you can sharpen your ability to discern subtle differences between answer choices.

Pay attention to conditional logic.

A strong grasp of conditional statements is essential for tackling complex Principle Questions effectively. Principles often involve "if-then" relationships or other forms of conditional logic, requiring you to evaluate how different conditions relate to the argument. Practice translating principles into clear logical structures and apply them to various scenarios to enhance your analytical skills.

Repeat every question you miss three times.

Each mistake is an opportunity to improve. After completing practice questions, review errors carefully to identify whether you misunderstood the principle or selected an incorrect answer choice. Pay attention to recurring patterns in your mistakes and use these insights to adjust your approach. Over time, this self-assessment will help refine your reasoning and increase your accuracy.

Expert Advice: While studying, if I missed a question, I would repeat 3 of the same question type, specifically articulating my reasoning justifying the right answer. Then I would attempt to construct arguments mirroring the structure of the stimulus I misunderstood. In doing so, I trained my brain to recognize a certain question type and be confident in my approach.

Focus on logical consistency.

The correct answer must consistently align with the argument’s conclusion, evidence, and overall reasoning. Be cautious of answers that deviate from the argument's intent or introduce irrelevant details. Logical consistency ensures that the principle acts as a clear and appropriate bridge between the evidence and the conclusion drawn.

Don’t forget about time management.

Efficient time management is critical during the LSAT. Practice reading stimuli and evaluating answer choices quickly without sacrificing accuracy. Develop a systematic approach to eliminate clearly incorrect answers first, allowing you to focus on the most viable options. Balancing speed and precision is key to excelling in both Principle Questions and the broader Logical Reasoning section.

Practice Resources for LSAT Principle Questions

To improve your skills, leverage these top resources:

• LSAT Prep Books: Comprehensive guides that cover logical reasoning question types in detail. These books often include official LSAT questions, offering reliable and targeted practice to help you master the nuances of Principle Questions.
• Online LSAT Prep Courses: Interactive lessons tailored to improving your understanding of Principle Questions. With video tutorials, adaptive quizzes, and live sessions, these courses allow you to develop critical skills like conditional logic and efficiently analyze complex arguments.
• Tutors and Study Groups: Personalized feedback and collaborative problem-solving can accelerate your progress. Collaborative problem-solving in study groups also allows you to gain fresh perspectives and learn effective strategies from peers preparing for the same test.

Reach Your Target LSAT Score With the Help of an Expert

Top law school admissions coaches provide tailored support to help you master principal questions on the LSAT, one of the most challenging aspects of the Logical Reasoning section. These professionals are skilled in breaking down complex logical structures, teaching conditional logic, and refining your ability to identify and apply principles effectively. With personalized strategies and real LSAT practice materials, coaches help you strengthen your skills and avoid common pitfalls, ensuring you approach Principle Questions with confidence and precision.

By working with a coach, you gain access to expert insights and proven methods that can significantly improve your LSAT performance. They focus on enhancing your understanding of how principles connect to an argument’s structure and teach you to apply them across diverse scenarios.

Eshaan S. is an LSAT tutor who has been helping applicants reach top scores since 2020. He himself scored a 175 and is passionate about helping students navigate the road bumps that come with acing standardized tests. His coaching methodology is highly customized to each student’s strengths and weaknesses, ensuring that every lesson is geared toward personalized improvements. Book a free intro call with Eshaan and reach your target LSAT score.

FAQs: LSAT Principle Questions

How to improve Logical Reasoning for LSAT?

• Logical reasoning is a skill that improves with practice. Solve puzzles, take practice tests, and work on a variety of logic-based problems to enhance your reasoning abilities.

What are supporting principle questions on the LSAT?

• A "Supporting Principle" question on the LSAT requires you to identify a principle or general rule that, if true, would most strongly support or justify the argument or conclusion presented in the passage.

Why is LR so hard?

• Part of the challenge of LR comes from the mental battle of staring down a stack of questions. You don't always know what will come next and where the test writers will take you. But part of what makes LR hard is that it's really testing two different skills—speed and intense logical reasoning.

How do you approach most strongly supported questions on the LSAT?

• To approach "Most Strongly Supported" questions on the LSAT, start by getting a thorough understanding of the passage, treating every statement as true within the context provided. Predict a possible answer before looking at the options, using the passage's information to infer what else must be true.

How do Principle Questions differ from other Logical Reasoning question types?

• Principle Questions require test-takers to identify or apply a general rule that underlies a specific argument or scenario. Unlike other Logical Reasoning questions that may focus on identifying assumptions or drawing inferences, Principle Questions emphasize understanding the broader rule that governs the reasoning presented.