PhD admissions is one of the most opaque processes in higher education. Applicants often obsess over publications, GPA cutoffs, and school prestige — yet many strong candidates still get rejected without feedback, while others with “non-perfect” profiles land top offers.
In this session, I’ll break down the most common myths around PhD admissions and walk you through how applications are actually evaluated behind the scenes. Drawing from my experience inside admissions committees and years of advising PhD applicants across the U.S. and Europe, we’ll unpack what truly moves the needle in competitive PhD programs — and where applicants tend to overinvest energy in the wrong signals.
This is especially useful if you’re applying in the upcoming cycle and want to pressure-test your strategy, not just polish documents.
